Stale-If-Error, Stale-While-Revalidate: HTTP Caching
Ever wonder how websites load fast even when servers lag? It's HTTP caching magic, specifically Stale-If-Error and Stale-While-Revalidate.
Here's the scoop:
- Stale-If-Error: Serves old content when the server's down. Your website's safety net.
- Stale-While-Revalidate: Shows cached content instantly while updating behind the scenes. Like a speed trick for loading.
Both use the Cache-Control
HTTP header:
Cache-Control: max-age=600, stale-while-revalidate=30
This tells your browser: "Use this for 10 minutes. After that, show the old version for up to 30 seconds while grabbing a new one."
Quick Comparison:
Feature | Stale-If-Error | Stale-While-Revalidate |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Prevents errors during server issues | Cuts perceived loading time |
When to use | Server failures, network problems | Regular content updates |
How it works | Serves stale content if fresh can't be fetched | Serves stale content while fetching fresh |
Best for | Critical pages, unpredictable servers | News sites, e-commerce, frequently updated content |
Bottom line: These methods keep your site speedy and reliable. Use Stale-If-Error to stay online no matter what. Use Stale-While-Revalidate to feel super-fast. Choose based on your content and user needs.
Related video from YouTube
1. Stale-If-Error
Stale-If-Error is your website's safety net. It's an HTTP caching trick that lets a cache serve old content when it can't get fresh data from the server.
How it works:
- User asks for a page
- Cache tries to get fresh content
- If the server errors out, the cache serves stale content
Users see something instead of an error page. It's great for server outages or network issues.
Real-world example:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: max-age=600, stale-if-error=1200
Content-Type: text/plain
success
This tells the cache:
- Use this content for 10 minutes
- If there's an error after that, use the old version for up to 20 minutes
So if the server crashes 15 minutes later, users still see old content, not an error.
Implementation options:
Method | Description | Best for |
---|---|---|
Varnish Enterprise | Use vmod_stale for flexibility |
Big websites |
HTTP headers | Set Cache-Control headers on your server |
Most websites |
Client-side | Implement in your app's network layer | Mobile or single-page apps |
Stale-If-Error balances freshness and availability. Use it for content that's better slightly outdated than missing.
2. Stale-While-Revalidate
Stale-While-Revalidate is a caching trick that serves old content fast while fetching new data behind the scenes. It's like instant gratification with a side of updates.
How it works:
- User asks for a page
- Cache serves the old version right away
- In the background, it checks for new content
- If there's new stuff, the cache updates for next time
Real-world example:
Cache-Control: max-age=1, stale-while-revalidate=59
This tells the browser:
- Use the cached version for 1 second
- For 59 more seconds, use the old version but check for updates
It's perfect for content that changes often but doesn't need to be 100% current.
The Google Publisher Tag team used this in 2016:
Cache-Control: private, max-age=900, stale-while-revalidate=3600
Meaning:
- The script is fresh for 15 minutes
- It can be used (while checking for updates) for another 60 minutes
Results? 0.5% more publisher revenue and 2% more early ad script loads.
When to use it:
Content Type | Example | Recommended Settings |
---|---|---|
Real-time data | Stock prices | max-age=0, stale-while-revalidate=60 |
Daily updates | News headlines | max-age=3600, stale-while-revalidate=82800 |
Static content | Logo images | max-age=60, stale-while-revalidate=2678400 |
Stale-While-Revalidate finds the sweet spot between speed and freshness. Use it when a slight delay in updates is okay, but you want things snappy for users.
sbb-itb-b5a6996
Good and Bad Points
Let's break down these caching methods:
Method | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Stale-If-Error | - Keeps user experience smooth during server errors - Ensures availability when server's down |
- Might serve old content if cache is stale |
Stale-While-Revalidate | - Boosts performance by serving stale content fast - Updates cache in background without user delay |
- Users might see temporarily outdated content |
Both aim to make the web faster and users happier, but they tackle different problems:
Stale-If-Error is your website's backup plan. If your server crashes, users still see content instead of errors.
Stale-While-Revalidate is all about speed. It's like serving yesterday's news while printing today's edition. Users get content fast, and it updates quietly.
Real-world win:
In 2016, Google's Publisher Tag team used Stale-While-Revalidate:
Cache-Control: private, max-age=900, stale-while-revalidate=3600
Result:
- 0.5% more publisher revenue
- 2% more early ad script loads
These methods aren't perfect. Stale-If-Error might serve old info if your server's down long. Stale-While-Revalidate could show outdated content briefly.
The key? Balance. Use these methods wisely based on your content and user needs.
Wrap-up
Key differences between Stale-If-Error and Stale-While-Revalidate:
Feature | Stale-If-Error | Stale-While-Revalidate |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Keeps site up during server errors | Makes content delivery faster |
When to use | Server issues or downtime | Need for instant content |
Behavior | Serves old content if new can't be fetched | Serves old content while fetching new in background |
User experience | Prevents error pages | Gives instant content with silent updates |
Stale-If-Error is your site's backup generator. Use it for:
- Must-stay-online pages
- Sites with unpredictable servers
- Content that doesn't change much
Stale-While-Revalidate is all about speed. Perfect for:
- News sites or blogs
- E-commerce product pages
- Weather or stock info
Real-world win:
"Google's Publisher Tag team used Stale-While-Revalidate in 2016. Result? 0.5% more revenue and 2% more early ad script loads."
Small changes, big impacts.
Remember, these aren't one-size-fits-all. Your choice depends on your content, update frequency, and user needs. A weather app might use Stale-While-Revalidate for instant forecasts with background updates. A bank might use Stale-If-Error to always show balances, even if not current.
The key? Balance freshness, speed, and availability. Use these tools smart, and you'll create a smoother, faster web for your users.
FAQs
What's the difference between stale-if-error and stale-while-revalidate?
These are two HTTP caching tricks with different jobs:
Directive | Purpose | Behavior |
---|---|---|
Stale-if-error | Keeps site up during server errors | Serves old content when new can't be fetched |
Stale-while-revalidate | Makes site faster by serving old content quickly | Serves old content instantly while fetching new in background |
Stale-if-error is your backup plan. It tells the browser: "If you can't get new stuff, use the old stuff." This keeps your site up when things go wrong.
Stale-while-revalidate is about speed. It says: "Here's the old content now, but I'll get you new stuff soon."
Real-world example:
Amazon's CloudFront uses both. With stale-while-revalidate, it serves cached content instantly while updating its cache quietly. This cuts wait times.
For stale-if-error, CloudFront can use old content if there's trouble getting new data. This keeps things smooth even during hiccups.
The big difference? Stale-while-revalidate is about being fast always. Stale-if-error is about staying online when things break.